Skip to content
Home » Blog » A Comparative Analysis of Attenuation and Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Headsets

A Comparative Analysis of Attenuation and Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Headsets

Abstract

The accuracy of audiometric testing is fundamentally reliant on controlling ambient noise to prevent the masking of test stimuli. Various audiometric transducers, including supra-aural, circumaural, and insert earphones, as well as integrated headset systems, offer differing levels of passive sound attenuation. This white paper evaluates a range of commonly used audiometric headsets, determining their sound attenuation characteristics and calculating their specific Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels (MPANLs) in accordance with ANSI S3.1-1999 (R2013) 1, or presenting published MPANLs where available. MPANLs are provided for testing to 0 dB HL. The objective is to identify transducers providing superior attenuation, thereby allowing for reliable audiometry in environments with higher ambient noise. A comprehensive table summarizes the 0 dB HL MPANLs for all evaluated headsets, highlighting the best-performing transducer at each standard audiometric frequency.


Infographic: A Comparative Analysis of Audiometric Headset Attenuation

The Quiet Revolution

A Visual Guide to Audiometric Headset Performance in Noisy Environments

63.3

dB SPL

Peak Allowable Noise at 4000 Hz with the Top-Performing Headset

Why Attenuation is Critical for Accurate Hearing Tests

Accurate hearing tests demand a quiet environment. Any background noise can "mask" the quiet test tones, leading to incorrect results and flawed clinical decisions. While sound booths are the traditional solution, they are expensive and immobile. The alternative is using headsets that passively block, or "attenuate," ambient noise. The better the attenuation, the noisier the environment can be while still allowing for a valid hearing test. This infographic explores which headsets perform best, enabling reliable "boothless" audiometry.

Understanding the Standard: The MPANL Formula

Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Level (MPANL) is the official measure of how loud a room can be for a valid test. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) provides a baseline for a person with "ears not covered." A headset's performance is calculated by adding its specific sound attenuation value to this baseline. Better attenuation means a higher, more flexible MPANL.

ANSI Baseline MPANL

(Ears Not Covered)

+

Headset Attenuation

(Noise Reduction)

=

Final Headset MPANL

(Permissible Noise)

Head-to-Head: MPANL Comparison at 500 Hz

The 500 Hz frequency is critical for understanding speech. Below is a direct comparison of how much ambient noise different headsets can tolerate at this frequency while testing to a 0 dB HL threshold. Higher bars indicate superior performance and greater flexibility for testing outside a sound booth.

The Winner's Circle: Top Attenuation by Frequency

Different headsets excel at blocking different sound frequencies. Here are the top performers for each standard audiometric test frequency, showcasing the highest permissible ambient noise level (MPANL) achieved.

125 Hz

60.0

Kuduwave (Foam)

250 Hz

58.7

Kuduwave (Foam)

500 Hz

59.8

Kuduwave (Foam)

1000 Hz

53.8

Kuduwave (Foam)

2000 Hz

57.6

RadioEar DD65v2

4000 Hz

63.3

Kuduwave (Foam)

8000 Hz

59.8

Kuduwave (Foam)

Performance Profiles Across Frequencies

This radar chart compares the full performance profile of three distinct headset technologies. A larger shape indicates better overall attenuation across the board. Notice the significant advantage of integrated and insert systems over traditional supra-aural designs, especially at low frequencies.

The Attenuation Hierarchy

Not all headset types are created equal. The data reveals a clear hierarchy in noise-blocking capability. Integrated systems, which combine multiple layers of attenuation, and insert earphones, which seal the ear canal, offer the best performance for testing in non-ideal environments.

Integrated Systems (e.g., Kuduwave, WAHTS)

HIGHEST ATTENUATION

Insert Earphones (e.g., E-A-RTONE 3A)

Circumaural (e.g., DD65v2, HDA 200)

Supra-aural (e.g., TDH-39, DD45)

LOWEST ATTENUATION

Key Takeaways for Clinical Practice

Low Frequencies Matter

The biggest challenge for boothless audiometry is low-frequency noise (e.g., HVAC, traffic). Headsets with superior low-frequency attenuation, like the Kuduwave (Foam) and WAHTS, are the most reliable choices.

Fit is Everything

The data shows a vast difference in performance between foam and silicone eartips on the same device. A proper, deep seal with a foam tip is critical to maximizing attenuation and achieving valid results.

Choose the Right Tool

For testing outside a booth, standard supra-aural headphones are highly susceptible to noise. To ensure accuracy, clinicians must select transducers with documented high attenuation, such as integrated systems or insert earphones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *